Journal of Dairy Science and Technology ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2): 37-43.DOI: 10.7506/rykxyjs1671-5187-20251104-073

• Analysis & Detection • Previous Articles    

Comparative Analysis of Identification Methods for Pediococcus spp. in Food

MING Ruoyang, ZHOU Wei, LIU Yumeng, WANG Hui, LI Yongyan, XIE Mengying, ZHANG Yalun   

  1. (Hebei Food Safety Key Laboratory, Key Laboratory of Special Food Supervision Technology, State Administration for Market Regulation, Hebei Engineering Research Center for Special Food Safety and Health, Hebei Food Inspection and Research Institute, Shijiazhuang 050227, China)
  • Published:2026-05-19

食品中片球菌属鉴定方法比较分析

明若阳,周巍,刘雨蒙,王慧,李永艳,谢梦颖,张雅伦   

  1. (河北省食品检验研究院,特殊食品安全与健康河北省工程研究中心,国家市场监督管理总局重点实验室(特殊食品监管技术),河北省食品安全重点实验室,河北 石家庄 050227)
  • 基金资助:
    河北省市场监管局科技计划项目(2024ZD03);食品安全国家标准制定项目(spaq-2023-32)

Abstract: In this study, the traditional physiological and biochemical method, a VITEK automatic biochemical analyzer, the analytical profile index (API) biochemical identification system, real-time fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction (real-time PCR) and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) were used comparatively to identify the species of Pediococcus spp. in food. The results showed that the traditional physiological and biochemical method was the most accurate but time-consuming and labor-intensive; the VITEK automatic biochemical analyzer gave unstable results as the database states that Pediococcus acidilactici is negative for amygdalin reaction, whereas some strains actually test positive; the API biochemical identification system yielded accurate results at 24 h of culture, while deviations occurred when the culture period was extended to 48 h; real-time PCR was time-saving, accurate, and suitable for popularization; the MALDI-TOF MS method had the shortest operation time but high equipment requirements, making it difficult to popularize in primary-level institutions. In summary, the traditional physiological and biochemical method, real-time PCR, and MALDI-TOF MS can all serve as standard methods for the identification of Pediococcus spp. in food. The results of this study can provide a technical basis for the formulation of relevant national standards.

Key words: Pediococcus spp.; conventional physiological and biochemical method; VITEK biochemical identification system; analytical profile index biochemical identification method; real-time fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction; matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry

摘要: 采用传统生理生化法、VITEK生化鉴定法、分析谱型指数(analytical profile index,API)生化鉴定系统、实时荧光定量聚合酶链式反应(polymerase chain reaction,PCR)法、基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry,MALDI-TOF MS)法对食品中片球菌属进行鉴定。结果表明,传统生理生化法结果最准确,但耗时长、工作量大;VITEK生化鉴定法因数据库规定乳酸片球菌苦杏仁苷反应为阴性,而实际部分菌株呈阳性,导致结果不稳定;API生化鉴定系统培养24 h结果准确,延长培养至48 h则出现偏差;实时荧光定量PCR法耗时短、结果准确,适合推广;MALDI-TOF MS法耗时最短,但设备要求高,难以在基层机构普及。综上,传统生理生化法、实时荧光定量PCR法和MALDI-TOF MS法均可作为食品中片球菌属鉴定的标准方法。本研究结果可为相关国家标准制定提供技术依据。

关键词: 片球菌属;传统生理生化法;VITEK生化鉴定法;分析谱型指数生化鉴定系统;实时荧光定量聚合酶链式反应法;基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱

CLC Number: