Welcome to visit Journal of Dairy Science and Technology!
Share:
中国科技核心期刊
ISSN 1671-5187
CN 31-1881/S
Toggle navigation
Home
About Journal
Editorial Board
Journal Online
Current Issue
Just Accepted
Archive
Most Read Articles
Most Download Articles
Most Cited Articles
E-mail Alert
Instruction
Subscription
Contact Us
中文
Journals
Publication Years
Keywords
Search within results
(((HUANG Xiaoyu[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])
AND
OR
NOT
Title
Author
Institution
Keyword
Abstract
PACS
DOI
Please wait a minute...
For Selected:
Download Citations
EndNote
Ris
BibTeX
Toggle Thumbnails
Select
Screening, Identification and Culture Condition Optimization of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum RT-6 Producing a High Amount of Exopolysaccharide
HUANG Xiaoyu, HAN Jin, YU Wenhui, WU Zhengjun
Journal of Dairy Science and Technology 2024, 47 (
2
): 15-23. DOI:
10.7506/rykxyjs1671-5187-20240409-019
Abstract
(
95
)
HTML
(
1
)
PDF
(3445KB)(
57
)
Knowledge map
Save
Exopolysaccharides (EPS) from Lactiplantibacillus plantarum have been found to possess a variety of biological activities such as antitumor and antioxidant, but few studies on the synthesis of EPS by L. plantarum in skim milk have been reported. The aim of the present study was to screen L. plantarum with high EPS production capability in skim milk, which will be great significance to the application of L. plantarum in dairy products. L. plantarum RT-6 (CGMCC No. 26778), with a high capability of producing EPS, was isolated from homemade yogurt collected in Guilin, Guangxi, China by the colony thread-drawing method. Its EPS producing capability was compared with that of other L. plantarum strains. The culture conditions for EPS production by L. plantarum RT-6 were optimized using one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) method and response surface methodology (RSM). It was found that among all tested L. plantarum strains, RT-6 exhibited the highest EPS yield when cultured in reconstituted skim milk, whereas most other strains grew slowly or even could not grow. The optimal culture conditions were determined as 39 h, 32 ℃, 101 mg/mL and 1.488 mmol/L for fermentation time, fermentation temperature, skim milk concentration and concentration of mixed essential amino acids, respectively. Under the optimized conditions, the yield of EPS was 241.1 mg/L, 2.6 times higher than that before optimization.
Related Articles
|
Metrics
Select
Regulation of Probiotics on the Concurrent Diarrhea with Enteral Nutrition of Patients
SHI Zhexi, ZHAO Yanfang, SHENG Jian, HUANG Xiaoyu, GU Pengfei, SHI Shengyi, HUA Jiayi, SHU Xiaoliang
Journal of Dairy Science and Technology 2018, 41 (
1
): 1-4. DOI:
10.15922/j.cnki.jdst.2018.01.001
Abstract
(
200
)
HTML
(
99
)
PDF
(1185KB)(
57
)
Knowledge map
Save
The purpose of this investigation was to study the regulation effects of probiotics on intestinal adaptation in patients undergoing enteral nutrition treatment. In total 157 patients with enteral nutrition treatment were divided into study (n = 101) and control groups (n = 56) using random number table. In this study a double-blind, randomized controlled trial was carried out. The basal energy expenditure (BEE) was calculated based on Harris-Benedict formula (nitrogen supply was 0.2 g/(kg·d)). The study group was given enteral nutrition and probiotics and the control group was given enteral nutrition alone. The experimental period was 10 days. We recorded basic demographic data and clinical information, observed body weight (kg) and body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2) at 0 and 10 days after enteral nutrition, and evaluated nutritional and metabolic status in the major organs such as intestine and kidney. Malnutrition was improved in both groups. On the 10th day after enteral nutrition treatment, plasma-albumin (ALB) and prealbumin (PA) in both groups were higher than those before treatment (P < 0.05). Compared with intestinal tolerance, the incidence of diarrhea in the study group was 10.9% (11/101), which was significantly lower than that (23.2%, 13/56) in the control group (P < 0.05), but the total incidence of single symptoms such as abdominal distension, abdominal colic, nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea was 45.5% in the study group and 53.6% in the control group, with no significant difference (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in body weight, BMI, NRS2002 nutritional risk score, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APAACHE)-II the cause and starting time of enteral nutrition, blood glucose (BG), serum creatinine (Cr) or blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (P > 0.05). Probiotics significantly improve intestinal adaptation in patients with enteral nutrition treatment, being conducive to the clinical application of enteral nutrition.
Related Articles
|
Metrics